arXiv (All)
open access
Work that Counts, and Work that Doesn't: Labor Supply in Experiments and Real Work
Do workers behave the same in experiments as they do in real life? Combining a real-effort emoji-counting experiment with platform records, self-reported expectations and recalls, and smartphone screen-time logs, we compare how the same workers on Prolific respond to randomized wage changes in the e
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- An Ecological Model of Digital Friction at Work: The Tree That Grew Between the Lines#155048
- The Effect of Hours of Work on Social Interaction#21428
- On-site, remote, and hybrid: Investigating the effects of work arrangement on the relationship between job demands, resources and work engagement#426371
- Perpetual connectivity as digital labor: a conceptual reframing of the always-on work culture.#281141
- "Post-Earnings Announcement Drift: Market Inefficiency or Research Design Biases?"#942641
Record · ID 1399876
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive