arXiv (All)
open access
When Is Disclosing Private Conversations with AI to the State Justified? Proactive Referral Policies of Major U.S. AI Companies through the Lens of Contextual Integrity
AI companies engage in "proactive referral": notifying law enforcement, without a government request, of user conversations they judge dangerous. This poses a dilemma: referral may expose people who merely confided dangerous thoughts to an AI to investigation, while not referring may leave actual vi
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Deepfakes in Court: How Judges Can Proactively Manage Alleged AI-Generated Material in National Security Cases#451751
- Artificial Intelligence and Legal Disruption: A New Model for Analysis#716912
- Sophistry on Steroids? The Ethics, Epistemology and Politics of Persuasive AI#119548
- Are publicly available (personal) data “up for grabs”? Three privacy arguments#85992
- Privacy Issues of AI#663234
Record · ID 1400002
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive