arXiv (All)
open access
Beyond the record: evaluating probabilistic AI weather forecasts deep in the tail
Can probabilistic artificial intelligence (AI) weather forecasts retain skill beyond their training domain? We compare four state-of-the-art AI models (ArchesWeatherGen, U-Cast, WeatherNext2 and GenCast-mini) with the physics-based IFS-ENS over land in 2022, at 1.5° resolution and lead times of 2--1
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- A dataset of one-dimensional idealized probabilistic fields#1061355
- Evaluating Extreme Precipitation Forecasts: A Threshold-Weighted, Spatial Verification Approach for Comparing an AI Weather Prediction Model Against a High-Resolution NWP Model#984917
- Can we create a `race to the top' for weather forecasts to inform smallholder farmer decisions?#1155717
- Probabilistic AI models outperform numerical weather prediction models on record breaking heat extremes#1355438
- Artificial intelligence pathways from weather to climate#1234137
Record · ID 1400369
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive