arXiv (All)
open access
Same path, different walk: a mechanistic comparison of looped and stacked transformer encoders on 12-lead ECG
Recurrent Transformers reusing their weights rather than stacking $L$ distinct layers are becoming widely adopted due to their parameter efficiency [1,2,3]. However, the exact representational and dynamical differences between looped and stacked architectures remain uncharacterized. This paper prese
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Same path, different: a mechanistic comparison of looped and stacked transformer encoders on 12-lead ECG#1109499
- LoopSpec: Pipelined Self-Speculative Decoding for Looped Transformers#1123569
- LoopSpec: Pipelined Self-Speculative Decoding for Looped Transformers#919396
- Decode-Branch Transformers: Decoupling the Primary Prefill Path from Additional Decode Computation#620451
- Decode-Branch Transformers: Decoupling the Primary Prefill Path from Additional Decode Computation#618772
Record · ID 1401019
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive