arXiv (All)
open access
Learning from a Bandit Learner
Classical inverse bandit methods typically aim to recover true reward parameters. In contrast, we infer a demonstrator's subjective beliefs, specifically its internal estimates of suboptimality gaps. We consider no-regret demonstrators that follow randomized policies, such as Thompson sampling, and
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Statistical Inference for Continuous Action Bandits#1234168
- Sharp Characterization of Bias in Post-Bandit Inference#1052257
- Reserve-Aware Contrast Certificates for Conservative Bandits with Uncertain Baselines#1144073
- Flow-Corrected Thompson Sampling for Non-Stationary Contextual Bandits#1048713
- Adaptive inference for functionals of M-estimands#1144241
Record · ID 1401282
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive