arXiv (All)
open access
A Pitfall in the Evaluation of Gene Perturbation Models
Gene perturbation models aim to predict transcriptional responses to unseen genetic interventions, but comparisons rely on heterogeneous evaluation metrics and differentially-expressed (DE) gene subsets. We investigate the consequences of these choices using eight methods across six single-gene pert
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Official Review · ICLR 2025#787104
- Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Predicting Cellular Responses to Gene Perturbation#1248366
- Causal Path Analysis from Perturbational and Population-Scale Single-Cell Data with Multiscale Confounding and Measurement Error#1122544
- PSGRN: Gene regulatory network inference from single-cell perturbational data through self-training with synthetic gold standards.#145832
- PopPert: Population-level Joint-Distribution Modeling for Single-Cell Perturbation Prediction#627737
Record · ID 1401443
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive