arXiv (All)
open access
Inconsistency between Frequentist and Bayesian inference, approximation of improper priors and permissible priors
Improper priors are widely used in objective Bayesian inference, although posterior propriety does not by itself guarantee coherence between Bayesian and frequentist assessments. We investigate this issue by approximating improper priors with proper priors and examining the convergence of the result
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Modern Bayesian Modeling and Inference#684973
- Constitutive Priors for Inverse Design#662425
- Constitutive Priors for Inverse Design#661375
- Logistic Gaussian process density regression: a generalized Bayesian approach#1110277
- Bayesianizm w polskiej tradycji probabilizmu – studium stanowiska Kazimierza Ajdukiewicza#744140
Record · ID 1401590
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive