arXiv (All)
open access
Looking Into The Past: The Impact of Context on Detecting Deceptive Statements
Deception detection typically considers messages in isolation. Previous works in claim verification and role detection have displayed that additional information such as gameplay history is crucial to successful predictions. In this work, we demonstrate the value of preceding gameplay dialogue when
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- DecepEval: A Benchmark for Evaluating Deception in LLM Agents#1217702
- Embodied Conversational Agent-Based Deception Detection#369770
- Creating a Realistic Experimental Scenario for HCI-Based Deception Detection Research with Ground Truth and Un- Sanctioned Malicious Acts#363417
- A comparative study of DistilBERT and Perceiver for deceptive review detection in hospitality review data.#1080582
- One Turn Too Late: Response-Aware Defense Against Hidden Malicious Intent in Multi-Turn Dialogue#160746
Record · ID 1402795
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive