arXiv (All)
open access
Judging the Justification: Decision Certificate Supervision for Generative Reward Models
Generative reward models (GenRMs) generate natural language rationales to justify preference judgments, yet a correct verdict does not guarantee a sound justification. Existing approaches often rely on reference explanations to supervise rationales, but obtaining such references can be costly and do
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Reason-guided Human Reward Modeling for Preference-based Reinforcement Learning#1387817
- Reason-guided Human Reward Modeling for Preference-based Reinforcement Learning#1375076
- Knowing Is Not Choosing: What Explicit Verification Adds Beyond Generative Preference#1117854
- What RL Brings to Reasoning: A Few Decisions the Base Model Would Not Make#1389609
- ERR+: Sequential Entropy Resolution for Efficient and Decisive LLM Reasoning#793014
Record · ID 1403324
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive