arXiv (All)
open access
EviDial: When Correct Depression Predictions Lack Evidence
Depression dialogue benchmarks commonly assess models by comparing predicted symptom labels with clinical scale scores. However, a prediction may agree with a benchmark label even when the dialogue lacks enough evidence to justify it. We introduce EviDial, a benchmark that distinguishes label agreem
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- AudiPsy: Evidence-Grounded Multimodal Reasoning over Spoken Counseling Conversations for Depression Assessment#1403363
- LongCounsel-8: A Benchmark Suite for Longitudinal Depression Tracking from Multi-Session Counseling Dialogues#926422
- Within-Person Symptom Dynamics in Serious Mental Illness: Insights from Daily Self-reports and Audio Journals#976753
- Scalable, context-sensitive psychiatric assessment with large language models and brief diaries#223244
- Clinical and Objective Psychiatric Analyses in Severe Depression.#854543
Record · ID 1403337
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive