arXiv (All)
open access
When LLMs Manipulate: Measuring Behavioral, Social, and Temporal Effects
artificial-intelligencecomputation-and-languagecomputers-and-societyhuman-computer-interactionmachine-learning
Large language models (LLMs) can influence user trust and decision-making through subtle linguistic cues, yet the behavioral effects of manipulative outputs remain poorly quantified. We introduce a behavioral computing framework for measuring \textit{behavioral vulnerability}, defined as users' susc
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- A Calibrated Reflection Approach for Enhancing Confidence Estimation in LLMs#927819
- SWE-DeceptionBench: Benchmarking Deceptive Behaviors of LLMs Across the Software Development Lifecycle#1298122
- SWE-DeceptionBench: Benchmarking Deceptive Behaviors of LLMs Across the Software Development Lifecycle#1291850
- Breaking the Mirror: Activation-Based Mitigation of Self-Preference in LLM Evaluators#1216184
- Probing Persona-Dependent Preferences in Language Models#1155199
Record · ID 1403369
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive