arXiv (All)
open access
Auditing the Product, Not the Recursion: The Evaluation Evidence Behind Recursive Self-Improvement Claims
Recursive self-improvement (RSI) promises AI systems, such as self-evolving LLM agents, that become better at producing further improvements. Evaluating this promise requires separating product claims about the final system from process claims about the improvement process itself. Existing surveys s
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- AI-Native Product Management: A Vision#1325719
- Can AI Agents Deliver Verifiable Network-Wide Outcomes Across Authority Boundaries?#997090
- Does self-distillation improve reasoning?#1344113
- Does self-distillation improve reasoning?#1319049
- Continuous Process-Level Evaluation for Evolving Enterprise AI Agent Skills#1169613
Record · ID 1403406
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive