arXiv (All)
open access
Local Allow, Global Deny: Why Per-Action Authorization Does Not Compose in LLM Agents
Autonomous LLM agents act through tools under per-action authorization: a local guard screens each tool call in isolation. We show that local authorization does not compose into global authorization. A compositional authorization failure (CAF) is a locally authorized execution, or a pair of locally
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Local Allow, Global Deny: Why Per-Action Authorization Does Not Compose in LLM Agents#1394160
- AGATE: Provenance-Based Runtime Defense Against Compositional Attacks on LLM Agents#1105389
- AgentSecBench: Measuring Prompt Injection, Privacy Leakage, and Tool-Use Integrity in LLM Agents#229449
- Trust No Tool: Evaluating and Defending LLM Agents under Untrusted Tool Feedback#200400
- AgentProv: Auditing Agentic LLM API Providers via Tool-use Policy Probes#819536
Record · ID 1403416
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive