PsyArXiv
metadata only
Human-like social performance does not imply human-like preference inference in large language models
As large language models (LLMs) increasingly act on people’s behalf, good decisions may not indicate accurate inference of human preferences. Across three social inference tasks, we show that decision quality and preference inference can dissociate. In a multi-attribute bargaining task, LLMs learned
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Human-like social performance does not imply human-like preference inference in large language models#1405146
- Human-like social performance does not imply human-like preference inference in large language models#1391663
- Probing Persona-Dependent Preferences in Language Models#1155199
- Bias Control and Injection for Multi-Agent Aggregation#1356626
- Reproducing human biases in route choice using large language models: Toward scalable behavioral modeling#363259
Record · ID 1404986
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive