OSF
open access
Psycholinguistic norm estimation depends on construct and procedure: LLM ratings, prototype projection, and embedding regression
Psycholinguistic norm estimation can use verbal instructions, labeled prototypes, or continuously rated training examples, but these procedures need not measure a construct identically. We compared zero-shot ratings from six large language models (LLMs), a prototype-defined BGE embedding axis, and s
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Polyrating: A Cost-Effective and Bias-Aware Rating System for LLM Evaluation#1327200
- Adding LLMs to the psycholinguistic norming toolbox: A practical guide to getting the most out of human ratings.#409188
- Cluster Validation Indices as Self-Supervised Objectives for Text Representation Learning#1200481
- Sentence-in-noise perception in Monolinguals and Multilinguals: The effect of contextual meaning, and linguistic and cognitive load.#751638
- How Human-Like Are Large Language Models? A Register-Aware Linguistic Evaluation Framework#820464
Record · ID 1405169
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive