OSF
open access
From Learning Theory to Fragmentation: CBT and the Problem of Borrowed Scientific Credibility
Cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) is widely regarded as the most scientifically grounded form of psychotherapy, owing to the extensive evidence from randomized controlled trials and meta-analyses. This article argues that this reputation increasingly rests on borrowed credibility. CBT was originall
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Mental Health Mission Mood Disorder Cohort Study#1044277
- Meta-Research Evidence for Evaluating Therapies#735237
- Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Bipolar Depression: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials: Stimulation magnétique transcrânienne dans les cas de dépression bipolaire : une revue systématique et une méta-analyse d'essais contrôlés à répartition aléatoire.#265227
- Real-World Evidence: Better than Nothing or the Future? A Perspective on Clinical Evidence Generation in Interventional Oncology.#170631
- NEUROMARK Randomized Controlled Trial#1282256
Record · ID 1405177
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive