OSF
open access
A Mystery, Not a Contradiction: Florensky's Trinitarian Antinomy and Scotus's Communicable Nature
The medieval debate over whether Aristotelian logic holds in divinis, from Anselm’s reply to Roscelin to Holcot’s “logic of faith,” returns in Pavel Florensky’s claim that the dogma of the Trinity is an antinomy. Harry James Moore has defended the stronger claim that Florensky was justified in maint
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Adorno and Lukács: The riddle of History and class consciousness in Adorno's philosophy#73275
- Critique and Rescue: Adorno’s Dialectical Diagnosis of Aristotle’s Metaphysics#734424
- Three Dialectical Relationships and the Necessity of Critique in Theodore Adorno's Works#100019
- An Interdisciplinary Course on Classical Athens#732545
- Proclaiming the Divine Logos to the Man of the Future#773404
Record · ID 1405189
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive