ScholarsBank
metadata only
CC BY-NC-ND
Utilizing Coordinated Data Analysis to Examine Structural, Linguistic, and Discursive Predictors of Thought-Feeling Inferences in Inferential Accuracy Research
When perceivers attempt to infer what another person is thinking and feeling during a conversation, the most robust predictor of their accuracy is the verbal information available in the interaction. Yet prior research in this area (inferential accuracy) has treated verbal information as a monolithi
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Detecting Hidden Chain-of-Thought in Large Language Models with Linguistic, Behavioral, and Mechanistic Indicators#799203
- Detecting Hidden Chain-of-Thought in Large Language Models with Linguistic, Behavioral, and Mechanistic Indicators#797780
- Variations in Inner Language and Conceptual Thought Experience#724291
- Relevance differently affects the truth, acceptability, and probability evaluations of “and”, “but”, “therefore”, and “if–then”#768577
- Linguistic Intuitions: Error Signals and the Voice of Competence#737999
Record · ID 1405516
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive