William & Mary Law School Scholarship Repository
metadata only
"We Can't Allow IoT Vendors to Pass Off All Such Liability to the Consumer": Investigating the U.S. Legal Perspectives on Liability for IoT Product Security
As the regulatory landscape for the Internet of Things (IoT) evolves, vendors are moving towards certifying their products for security. Thus, we need to understand who is liable when certification failures result in harm, i.e., when certified products have vulnerabilities that are exploited to caus
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- CyberSecurity in Critical IoT Devices#1189588
- xChk: Bring Your Own Identity -- Heterogeneous Assurance with Verifier-Determined Sufficiency#370288
- CVE-2026-101104 — MEDIUM 6.3#1176049
- 50 U.S.C. § 3618 — Collection of service charges for certification or validation of information assurance products#599056
- CVE-2026-96613 — HIGH 7.1#1176095
Record · ID 1406259
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive