arXiv CS
open access
Validating Autoformalized Specifications via Contrapuntal Languages
Formal specifications can make AI-generated code mechanically checkable. Because user intent is typically expressed in natural language rather than formal logic, specifications must first be derived from it, e.g., via LLM-based autoformalization. Yet autoformalized specifications are themselves untr
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Validating Autoformalized Specifications via Contrapuntal Languages#1414739
- VALIDATING REQUIREMENTS SPECIFICATIONS STATED IN KNOWLEDGE REPRESENTATION LANGUAGE TEMPLAR#933483
- Diversifying to Verify: When Task-Equivalent Programs Differ in Verifiability#361509
- Programming with Specifications#1361941
- SpecAgent: Empowering Program Verification with Agentic Synthesis of Formal Program Specifications#1201145
Record · ID 1406517
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive