arXiv CS
open access
Turning Quantum Compiler Configuration Selection Upside Down: A Top-Down Paradigm
Selecting an effective quantum compiler configuration requires coordinated decisions over both hardware targets and compiler settings, with the ultimate goal of improving circuit execution fidelity. Existing SOTA approaches typically decompose this problem into two sequential stages: a device is cho
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Turning Quantum Compiler Configuration Selection Upside Down: A Top-Down Paradigm#1413411
- Why Are We Unrolling? The Importance of Structured Quantum Programs for Compilation#1110549
- QROB: Quantifying Realization Overhead in Quantum Compilation via Reverse Construction#984673
- Breaking the chain: geometry-native state preparation with ASPIRE#1188206
- A Dynamic Intermediate Representation for Hybrid Quantum-Classical Programs#821025
Record · ID 1406533
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive