arXiv (OAI Expanded)
open access
Can Agents Adapt Their Institutions And Sacrifice Themselves During Collapse? Executable Self-Governance in a GovSim Commons
LLM agents are beginning to write the rules they live under: policies, contracts and code that other agents review and approve. What happens when those rules must decide who is sacrificed from a group? We built GovSim-SelfGovern, a commons in which agents legislate in executable Python, test each la
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Towards Agentic AI Governance: A Preliminary Assessment#349665
- Human Agency Under Algorithmic Governance: A Humanities Framework for Law, Management and Public Life#373132
- Organizational Control Layer: Governance Infrastructure at the Execution Boundary of LLM Agent Systems#615050
- Organizational Control Layer: Governance Infrastructure at the Execution Boundary of LLM Agent Systems#614083
- Deontic Policies for Runtime Governance of Agentic AI Systems#1083119
Record · ID 1406579
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive