arXiv (All)
open access
Selecting the Best Few with Human Evaluators: Adaptively Combining Ratings and Pairwise Comparisons
This paper considers a decision-maker tasked with identifying the $k$ best items from a large pool of candidates, such as job applicants, LLMs, award nominees, or new product ideas. The decision-maker learns about the items' quality by soliciting human evaluations. Each evaluation can be costly, so
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Fairness trade-offs in expert evaluation: information, judgment, and procedural design#428767
- Validating AI Through Evaluation#370145
- A CaLLM Judge is a Better Judge: Mitigating Bias in LLM-as-a-judge#1343299
- Complexity of Judgment Aggregation#727525
- PEJWAK: A Profile-Echoing Self-Anchored Aggregation Architecture for Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis#997568
Record · ID 1411832
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive