arXiv (All)
open access
Auditing Where Concept Bottleneck Accuracy Comes From on CUB
Concept Bottleneck Models (CBMs) promise predictions that humans can inspect and correct through concepts such as "curved beak". Yet on CUB-200-2011, their standard benchmark, progress is measured like that of ordinary classifiers: by task and concept accuracy. Neither reveals whether the label is p
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Parameter-Efficient Construction of the Rashomon Slice for Concept Bottleneck Models#1062813
- Hoeffding Concept Bottleneck Models with Applications to Overhead Images#1327406
- The Standardization Trap: Certifying Joint Label Processing in Tabular Foundation Models#1218049
- How far does a random forest generalize from a 54-run LAMMPS+SPICA benchmark?#319648
- Beyond Trained Models: Compiling GNNs for a Sound Explainer Benchmark#1188204
Record · ID 1412034
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive