arXiv (All)
open access
Thinking Like a Scientist? A Structural Study of LLM-Generated Research Methods
Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly used to guide research methodology, yet their default methodological tendencies under minimal prompting remain unclear. Here, we prompt GPT-5.1, Gemini 3 Pro, and DeepSeek-V3.2 with an LLM-extracted research question from each of 1,000 recent arXiv compu
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- When Do Large Language Models Exhibit Unsolicited Deception?#986775
- When Tools Get in the Way: The Effect of Unnecessary Tool Availability on LLM Answering#1083623
- What Kind of Reasoning (if any) is an LLM actually doing? On the Stochastic Nature and Abductive Appearance of Large Language Models#701151
- The Real Explanation of GPT: A Structural Decomposition of the Large Language Model Black Box#692186
- Energy-Efficient Code Generation Using Large Language Models: A Systematic Literature Review#1048583
Record · ID 1412523
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive