arXiv (All)
open access
Proof-Carrying Contracts: Commitments AI Agents Cannot Break
artificial-intelligencecryptography-and-securityd-4-6i-2-11logic-in-computer-sciencemultiagent-systemssystems-and-control
AI agents increasingly act on behalf of people or other agents, purchasing services, exchanging information and delegating work. What an agent must respect is written in instructions, policies or agreements, but text alone cannot make it comply. It may make mistakes, be redirected by what it reads,
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Proof-Carrying Contracts: Commitments AI Agents Cannot Break#1394138
- From Protocols to Evidence: Bounded Claims for AI in Service of the Common Good#673492
- Soulbound AI, Soulbound Robots: How Ethereum's ERC-5192 Creates Fingerprints for Autonomous AI Agents (AI Rights 7)#704623
- Viva La Vida: Verification and Accumulation Failures in Multi-Agent Proof Search#1200480
- Maestro: Agentic Formal Proof Development by Coordination#1401110
Record · ID 1412545
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive