arXiv (All)
open access
What Git Does Not Record: Provenance Legibility in Two AI-Assisted Research Repositories
Publishers and funders increasingly ask authors to disclose how AI tools contributed to a piece of research. In computational work the repository is where an author or an auditor would look for the answer, and we ask what it can actually supply. We audit two single-investigator repositories by the s
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- GitScholar: A Dataset for Predicting AI Research Impact from GitHub Engagement#1062257
- GitScholar: A Dataset for Predicting AI Research Impact from GitHub Engagement#1043117
- Beyond the Gatekeeper: A Framework for AI-Assisted Open Peer Review and Decentralized Scientific Evaluation#691781
- A Methodology for Investigating AI Patterns Prevalence in Software Repositories#329161
- AI-Research Agents in the Wild. From GitHub and arXiv to Regularities and Gaps#999958
Record · ID 1412896
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive