arXiv (All)
open access
CompLit: Scientific Literature Search Benchmarks Must Cover Implicit, Cumulative, and Unmet Needs
How much can we trust an agent to find the paper we need? As researchers, we search the literature from what we have read toward what we have not. We thus describe what we want in our own terms, which a paper may show only implicitly; our requirements grow as we read; and what we seek may lie in an
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- CALIBRATED AI REVIEWER: AN ALGORITHM FOR COMPARING SCIENTIFIC JOURNALS WITH HIGH AND LOW ENTRY BARRIERS#141283
- AgentIdeaBench: Benchmarking Scientific Ideation in the Agent Era#984521
- AI-Research Agents in the Wild. From GitHub and arXiv to Regularities and Gaps#999958
- Scaling Automatic Research Agents via World Models#998329
- Official Review · ICLR 2026#787123
Record · ID 1412899
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive