arXiv (All)
open access
Learning Checklists to Reduce Lottery Effects in Scientific Peer Review
Reviewer lottery error describes error due to a small set of peer reviews attending to only some of the issues with a paper that a larger pool of eligible reviewers would raise. We show this error can be reduced by surfacing a checklist of criticisms learned from a historical review corpus. Our appr
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Reply to the Reviewers#106925
- More Criticism Does Not Make a Better Review: EquiReview-R#639731
- Peer review: historical evolution and reviewers' learning.#220934
- Inefficiency and inequity of the law review submission system.#285192
- Early Career Reviewer Hub: Paving the way for the next generation of peer reviewers.#659432
Record · ID 1412907
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive