arXiv (All)
open access
Benchmarking the Quantum Leap: Auditing LLM Evaluation for Quantum Code Generation
Large language models (LLMs) can generate quantum programs, but reliable evaluation remains difficult because benchmarks differ in task composition, scoring, and failure handling. We evaluate 15 hosted frontier, open-weight, quantum-specialized, and retrieval-augmented models on five quantum code-ge
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- QBugLM: An Agentic Benchmarking Framework for LLM-based Quantum Software Debugging#1062922
- QTestBench: A Test Framework for Evaluating LLM-Generated Quantum Code#1298307
- QTestBench: A Test Framework for Evaluating LLM-Generated Quantum Code#1291801
- Dataset for <i>Model-Driven for Quantum Software Engineering: A Systematic Mapping Study</i>#380003
- Toward Quantum Software Automation: A Quantum-Aware Harness for LLM-Guided Evolution#1169644
Record · ID 1412919
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive