arXiv (All)
open access
A Mechanistic Study of Automated Failure Attribution in LLM-based Agentic Systems
Agentic systems have demonstrated strong capabilities on complex tasks by enabling multiple interacting large language model (LLM)-based agents to collaborate and execute subtasks in parallel. However, this collaborative structure introduces new challenges for reliably evaluating and diagnosing syst
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Detect Before You Attribute: Cascade Failure Attribution for Multi-Agent Systems#798285
- Detect Before You Attribute: Cascade Failure Attribution for Multi-Agent Systems#796872
- Towards Agentic Agent-Based Models: Feasibility, Performance, and Statistical Model Checking#1360659
- DCFA: Dual-view Causal-inspired Attribution for Failure Reasoning in LLM-based Multi-agent Systems#971421
- ForesightSafety-SAGE:A Fully Automated Scenario Generation and Safety Evaluation Framework for LLM Agents#800068
Record · ID 1413052
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive