arXiv (All)
open access
Credit Where Credit Is Due: Contrastive Attribution Topology Search for Multi-Agent Systems
An LLM multi-agent system (MAS) is only as good as the agents it chooses to trust: its accuracy and cost hinge on its topology, meaning which agents are included and how they communicate. A single task score, however, does not reveal which agents help or hinder performance. We propose Contrastive At
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- BLADE: Auditing Information Use for Failure Attribution in LLM Multi-Agent Systems#1344276
- BLADE: Auditing Information Use for Failure Attribution in LLM Multi-Agent Systems#1319060
- Algorithmic Decision-Making, Agency Costs, and Institution-Based Trust#106613
- Concealing LLM-Based Multi-Agent Topology via Phantom Structure Injection#1141886
- Concealing LLM-Based Multi-Agent Topology via Phantom Structure Injection#1122194
Record · ID 1413897
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive