arXiv (All)
open access
VeruSteer: Learning What to Repair Next in Verus
LLM-based verification systems repair Rust proofs by revising programs in response to Verus diagnostics. When several error types are reported, pipelines such as AutoVerus and VeruSAGE select the next repair target using a preset priority. Yet each repair changes the program and the errors that foll
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- VeruSteer: Learning What to Repair Next in Verus#1406522
- Fewer Assumptions by Design: A Reusable Skill for LLM-Assisted Verus Verification#1108826
- Fewer Assumptions by Design: A Reusable Skill for LLM-Assisted Verus Verification#1129498
- Can LLMs Reason Like Automated Theorem Provers for Rust Verification? VCoT-Bench: Evaluating via Verification Chain of Thought#617998
- Can LLMs Reason Like Automated Theorem Provers for Rust Verification? VCoT-Bench: Evaluating via Verification Chain of Thought#617498
Record · ID 1414360
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive