CanLII
metadata only
Niazi v. Canada (Attorney General)
Decided: 2026-10-15. Docket: T-899-25. Citation: 2026 FC 1271 (CanLII). Administrative law — Judicial review — Reasonableness — Whether decision was unreasonable for failing to engage with coercion and duress claim — Admission treated as determinative with no discernable chain of analysis — Vavilov transparency, intelligibility, justification requirements applied — Decision set aside and matter remitted for redetermination | Evidence — Administrative decision-making — Weight of evidence — Whether screening numbers and CCTV footage could support misconduct finding where minimum requirements withheld for confidentiality — CCTV did not show manipulation — No evidence available to contextualize “well below” minimum requirement — Misconduct finding rested essentially on admission — Judicial rev
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Fearing v. Gardaworld Cash Services Canada Corporation#1347091
- S.M. c. R.#1090907
- R. v. Brown#1053802
- Olasedidun v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration)#1120801
- Novak v. CIBC World Markets Inc.#928682
Record · ID 1415432
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive