OSF
open access
Identifying questionable research practices during the planning phase of clinical trials: A rapid review and expert survey
Background: Clinical trials generate causal evidence for clinical practice and health policy and must adhere to stringent ethical and methodological regulations. However, the trustworthiness of published trials has been challenged. Questionable research practices (QRPs) are errors and manipulations
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Ethical clinical trial design and differences in treatment effects#244893
- A taxonomy of multinational ethical and methodological standards for clinical trials of therapeutic interventions#117585
- Proxy consent to clinical research participation: how should it be justified?#130698
- Proxy consent to clinical research participation: how should it be justified?#30963
- Proxy consent to clinical research participation: how should it be justified?#30756
Record · ID 1416431
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive