ScholarlyCommons
metadata only
CC BY 4.0
Minimum clinically important differences in acute pain: A patient-level re-analysis of randomized controlled analgesic trials submitted to the US Food and Drug Administration
The lack of established minimum clinically important differences in acute pain has made it challenging to interpret efficacy in analgesic trials. We performed a patient-level re-analysis of double-blind, placebo-controlled trials submitted to the US Food and Drug Administration to estimate minimum c
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Prospective Observational Clinical Study to Evaluate Patient Outcomes Following Pharmacogenetic Testing of Patients Undergoing Elective Surgical Procedures#852165
- Transversus Abdominis Plane Block in the Management of Acute Postoperative Pain Syndrome After Caesarean Section#1350946
- Patient Retrospective Outcomes (PRO)#1125270
- Effect of Complementary and Alternative Medicine on Pain Among Inpatients#1113087
- Evolution of Outcome Assessment in Chronic Low Back Pain Clinical Trials Throughout the 20th and 21st Centuries: A Scoping Review.#1347282
Record · ID 1416851
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive