ScholarlyCommons at Penn
metadata only
CC BY 4.0
In vitro comparison between complete arch abutment-level implant impressions with photogrammetry, grammetry, and intraoral scanning
Statement of problem: Photogrammetry (PG) has emerged as a promising recording technique for fabricating implant-supported prostheses. However, the existing evidence on the accuracy of dental PG devices is still limited. Purpose: The purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate the trueness and pr
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- In vitro comparison between complete arch abutment-level implant impressions with photogrammetry, grammetry, and intraoral scanning#1416807
- Comparison of Non-Calibrated Splinting Bodies and T-Marker for Complete-Arch Implant Scanning#864864
- Precision of Complete-arch Digital Implant Impressions With Intraoral Scanning Versus Photogrammetry#802400
- Lnfluence of the Prosthetic Emergence Profile on the Prevalence of Peri-implant Diseases#810982
- Effect of Face Scanning on Accuracy of Dental Implant Placement in Fixed Implant Supported Maxillary Prostheses#831484
Record · ID 1416908
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive