arXiv CS
open access
Beyond Accuracy: Disentangling Decomposition from Typed-State Quality Assurance in Multi-Agent LLM Pipelines
Multi-agent LLM pipelines are often credited with gains in software engineering tasks, but it is rarely clear whether a gain stems from the typed contract between agents or from the specialized prompts that decomposition enables. We study this attribution problem in Requirements Engineering, compari
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Beyond Accuracy: Disentangling Decomposition from Typed-State Quality Assurance in Multi-Agent LLM Pipelines#1424398
- Not All RAGs Are Created Equal: A Component-Wise Empirical Study for Software Engineering Tasks#187377
- Taint-Style Vulnerability Detection and Confirmation for Node.js Packages Using LLM Agent Reasoning#123964
- Knowledge-Centric Agents for Workflow Generation#381791
- FlowMaker: From Tasks to Cost-Efficient Generative AI Workflow Deployments#1389807
Record · ID 1417893
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive