arXiv CS
open access
Tracing Hallucinations in LLM Reasoning for UML Class Diagram Generation: An Empirical Taxonomy and Mitigation Study
Large Language Models (LLMs) can generate UML class diagrams from natural language requirements, but hallucinations may compromise the correctness and completeness of the resulting diagrams. Existing evaluations mostly assess the final diagram, without examining the intermediate traces of reasoning-
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Tracing Hallucinations in LLM Reasoning for UML Class Diagram Generation: An Empirical Taxonomy and Mitigation Study#1424064
- Language Models as Higher-Order Planning Formalizers#1388347
- Can LLMs Learn and Apply Multi-Level Modelling Semantics? A First Empirical Study#370398
- Tasks over Application Manuals: Revealing Gaps in Long-Horizon Procedural Reasoning for Language Models#1070513
- Suppressing Hallucination for Trustworthy LLMs (Part I – Semantic Reliability Framework)#97346
Record · ID 1417895
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive