ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Analgesia in Minimally Invasive Direct Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: Programmed Intermittent Bolus Infusions of Erector Spinae Plane Block Versus Paravertebral Block
Paravertebral block (PVB) has been regarded as effective regimen for pain control after cardiac surgery. As a novel analgesia technique, erector spinae plane block (ESPB) has been reported to provide effective analgesia after thoracic and cardiac surgery. We hypothesized that the ESPB is non-inferior to PVB in treating pain in minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass surgery.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Paravertebral Block Versus Erector Spinae Plane Block for Modified Radical Mastectomy in Womens.#1293593
- ESP Catheter Vs Single Shot ESP for Open Heart Surgery in Infants#909272
- Erector Spinae Block Versus Paravertebral Block on Chronic Pain After Mastectomy#1088241
- Effects of erector spinae plane block on postoperative pain in patients undergoing implant-based breast reconstruction for breast cancer: a randomized controlled trial#684635
- Efficacy of Erector Spinae Plane Block in Caridac Surgery#896145
Record · ID 1418358
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive