ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Simplified IUD Insertion Technique
This is a randomized controlled trial that compares traditional IUD insertion with that of a no uterine sound, no bimanual pelvic exam approach. The investigators hypothesis is that IUD placement is safe and effective without pre-procedural assessment of uterine size, direction, or depth.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Comparison of Pain Level During Intrauterine Device (IUD) Insertion Between Conventional and Direct Method#1381727
- GyneFix-Viz*: A Study of Serosal-Anchor (SA) Distance#897154
- IUD Placement Without Sounding#900751
- Comparison of the Difficulty on Insertion of IUD Devices Between Nulliparous and Multiparous Women#1378219
- PORTAS 2, Comparing Venae Sectio Versus Punction of Vena Subclavia for Insertion of a Totally Implantable Access Port#1173766
Record · ID 1418961
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive