ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
1L- vs. 4L-PEG for Bowel Preparation Among Inpatients.
Background and aims: Inpatients are at high risk for inadequate colon cleansing. Experts recommend 4L-polyethylene-glycol (PEG) solution because of its effectiveness and safety profile. A higher colon cleansing adequacy rate for a hyperosmolar 1L-PEG plus ascorbate prep has been recently reported in an observational study among more than 1,000 inpatients. Thus, the present study is aimed at determining whether 1L-PEG outperforms 4L-PEG among inpatients, through a propensity score-matching between the two groups in order to correct for confounders.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Comparison of Two Methods of Administration of a PEG Solution#1008714
- Patient Satisfaction and Efficacy of Different PEG-based Bowel Preparations- an Observational Study#966915
- Comparison of Two Methods for Bowel Preparation in Patients With Constipation#1162166
- App-Based Education and Low-Residue Diet for Colonoscopy Preparation#1114179
- Colonoscopy Preparation Optimization for INpatients- COIN Study#993039
Record · ID 1419192
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive