Conceptio › Archive › ClinicalTrials.gov
ClinicalTrials.gov public full text Public Domain

Validity and Reliability of Arabic Version of Extended Aberdeen Spine Pain Scale

Cairo University · 2025
ClinicalTrials.gov · Datasets · License: Public Domain · 2025
Open Source ↗
low-back-painpatient-reported-outcome-measuresquestionnaire-validationreliability
The goal of this observational study is to determine whether the Arabic version of the Extended Aberdeen Spine Pain Scale (EASPS) is a valid and reliable tool for assessing spine-related pain and functional disability in Arabic-speaking adults with nonspecific spinal pain. The main questions it aims to answer are: * Is the Arabic version of the EASPS a valid instrument for evaluating spine-related pain and disability among Arabic-speaking patients? * Is the Arabic version of the EASPS a reliable instrument with acceptable internal consistency and test-retest reliability? Participants will: * Complete the Arabic version of the Extended Aberdeen Spine Pain Scale (EASPS). * Complete the Arabic version of the Short Form-36 (SF-36) questionnaire to assess construct validity. * Participate in the cultural adaptation and validation process of the Arabic EASPS. * A subgroup of participants will complete the Arabic EASPS again after 7 days to assess test-retest reliability.
Conceptio Open Archive

Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio

Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.

This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗

Related documents

Record · ID 1419850
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive