ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Carotid Revascularization With MicroNet Covered Stent Comparing Early Neurological Outcomes With Distal Versus Proximal EPS
The SIBERIA study demonstrated a clear advantage of CGuard stent implantation over the existing classical stent when using a distal anti-embolic device. At the same time, there is no Level 1 evidence for a difference between the proximal and distal anti-embolic device for the CGuard stent.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- SVS VQI TransCarotid Revascularization Surveillance Project#913554
- Boston Scientific Embolic Protection, Inc. (EPI): A Carotid Stenting Trial for High-Risk Surgical Patients (BEACH)#1196366
- Endovascular Treatment for Small Core and Proximal Occlusion Ischemic Stroke#800196
- Comparative Study Of Safety And Efficacy Of The SUPERA® Nitinol Stent - Iliac Artery#904308
- Conception d'un modèle d'étude du comportement des endoprothèses vasculaires, au cours du temps, en milieux simulant les conditions physiologiques et les contraintes mécaniques#1066349
Record · ID 1421222
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive