arXiv (All)
open access
Closing the Navigation Compliance Gap in End-to-end Autonomous Driving
Trajectory-scoring planners achieve high navigation compliance when following the expert's original command, yet they struggle at intersections when presented with alternative commands; over 30 percent of such commands are ignored. We attribute this navigation compliance gap to two root causes: (1)
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- World4Scorer: Outcome-Grounded World Modeling for Autonomous Driving#1131280
- From Proxy Learning to Driving Decisions: A Transfer-Based Framework for Evaluating Future-Aware Autonomous Driving Planners#924828
- From Proxy Learning to Driving Decisions: A Transfer-Based Framework for Evaluating Future-Aware Autonomous Driving Planners#920594
- Trajectory Planning without Trajectory Data: A Manifold-Guided Approach#1232902
- De-Diffusing WAMs: Action-Sufficient Direct Prediction for Robot Control#1412096
Record · ID 1422788
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive