arXiv (All)
open access
Do LLMs Benefit From Their Own Words?
In multi-turn conversations, large language models typically condition on the full conversation history: both past user prompts and assistant responses. We revisit this design choice by comparing full-context prompting to four alternative, substantially-reduced context configurations. Analyzing in-t
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- The Persona Hierarchy Model: Understanding Contextual Generalization in Fine-Tuning LLMs#1233423
- A Cross-Domain Evaluation of Prompting Techniques for Large Language Models#1389859
- Beyond Prompt Engineering: A Systematic Analysis of Prompt Lexical Sensitivity and Its Impacts on Quality#656794
- The Ethics of Prompt Engineering#1387370
- When Do Large Language Models Exhibit Unsolicited Deception?#986775
Record · ID 1423794
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive