arXiv (All)
open access
When AI Blurs the Boundaries of Contribution: An Empirical Study of Authorship Calibration
The broad adoption of Artificial Intelligence (AI), especially Generative AI, raises pressing questions about how users interact with these systems to produce new content. In this paper, we introduce the concept of authorship calibration, defined as users awareness of their actual authorship when in
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- When AI Blurs the Boundaries of Contribution: An Empirical Study of Authorship Calibration#373437
- "Is This Book AI-Generated?" How Authorship Suspicion Manifests in Marketplace Reviews#1119023
- Authorship, Attribution, and Audience#1393350
- Large Language Model Turnover Undermines Screening for Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Scientific Writing#1248879
- Epistemic Dependence at Machine Speed: Extending Kitcher's Division of Cognitive Labor and Hardwig's Conditions for Warranted Trust to Human–AI Research Collaboration#707638
Record · ID 1423925
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive