arXiv (All)
open access
Can We Trust Evaluations of AI Weather Forecasts for Extremes? How Evaluation Protocols Shape Model Rankings
AI weather models perform competitively with traditional physics-based models at a fraction of the computational cost, and they are thus already used operationally. However, studies reach conflicting conclusions about their ability to forecast extreme weather events, and comparisons across studies a
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Evaluating Extreme Precipitation Forecasts: A Threshold-Weighted, Spatial Verification Approach for Comparing an AI Weather Prediction Model Against a High-Resolution NWP Model#984917
- Probabilistic AI models outperform numerical weather prediction models on record breaking heat extremes#1355438
- Can AI Forecast the Extremes? Evaluating Probabilistic Weather Models on Tropical Cyclones#1357732
- Can AI Forecast the Extremes? Evaluating Probabilistic Weather Models on Tropical Cyclones#1348872
- Physics-based models outperform AI weather forecasts of record-breaking extremes.#145836
Record · ID 1424355
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive