arXiv (All)
open access
SoundnessBench: Can Your AI Scientist Really Tell Good Research Ideas from Bad Ones?
Autonomous AI research agents aim to speed up scientific discovery by automating the research pipeline from hypothesis generation to peer review. However, existing benchmarks rarely test a fundamental bottleneck whether LLMs can judge the methodological viability of a research idea $\textbf{before}$
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Beyond the Gatekeeper: A Framework for AI-Assisted Open Peer Review and Decentralized Scientific Evaluation#691781
- Training AI Scientists to Replicate Research#451297
- MLOps-Bench: Benchmarking AI Agents on Production ML Engineering in Real Repositories#1387777
- MLOps-Bench: Benchmarking AI Agents on Production ML Engineering in Real Repositories#1375106
- Experts Rise Where LLMs Disagree: Using Cross-Model Disagreement to Target Expert Effort in LLM Codebook Revision for Large-Scale Annotation#1063137
Record · ID 1424728
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive