CanLII
metadata only
Irvin v. Canada (Attorney General)
Decided: 2026-10-21. Docket: 26-T-349. Citation: 2026 CanLII 111078 (FC). Procedure — Judicial review — Extension of time — Federal Courts Act, subs. 18.1(2) — Motion to extend time to commence an application for judicial review — Four-factor analysis from Canada (Attorney General) v Larkman applied — Failure to request second review within 30-day deadline central — Motion dismissed | Procedure — Time limits — Continuing intention — Whether the Applicant established a continuing intention to challenge the decision for the entire delay period — Evidence of steps taken before and after expiry of the time limit assessed — Sporadic activity in preparing motion materials found insufficient — Continuing intention not established — Extension refused | Procedure — Extension of time — Potential mer
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Assis v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration)#1426156
- Shirouzhan v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration)#1426157
- Nemaga v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration)#1426154
- Salazar Palacios v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration)#1426158
- Kameni Kambi c. Canada (Citoyenneté et Immigration)#1426153
Record · ID 1426155
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive